Pages

Tuesday, 22 September 2026

EXCLUSIVE: Patrick Byrne Drops Bombshells — China Is the Main Shareholder — If Dems Flip Congress, America Is Over

 

Patrick Byrne warns Americans that this may be our last free election if the radical Democrats flip Congress.

 

Former Overstock CEO Patrick Byrne sat down with Pete Santilli for the first installment of a Gateway Pundit exclusive election 2026 series and laid out what he calls years of fieldwork into foreign election-manipulation technology.

Byrne, author of The Deep Rig and Danger Close and co-founder of the America Project with Gen. Michael Flynn, said he partnered after the 2020 election with legendary CIA figure Gary Burnson and longtime Venezuela specialist Martin Rodil after cartel sources pointed them to a “weapon” that allegedly could fix elections. Eventually, up to fifteen Venezuelan defectors worked with Byrne and described the systems from the inside. 

In this recent interview, Byrne told Santilli the work took him overseas for roughly two and a half years undercover.  Byrne said sources demonstrated equipment that could spit out any result, leave no audit trail, and defeat verification. At Byrne’s prompting, one source told Flynn the network had manipulated elections for twenty years across seventy-two countries — a moment Byrne called among the most dramatic of his life.

Patrick Byrne also estimated that around 25% of Democrat votes today may actually be fraudulent. This is something that sounds plausible considering their insistence on cheating in elections anyway possible.

Byrne framed the alleged election apparatus as one arm of a larger Cuban-Venezuelan project, with China as the “main shareholder,” aimed at the incremental capture of Western institutions and the eventual collapse of the United States through “movement warfare” rather than a conventional invasion.

President Trump discussed the vulnerabilities of electronic voting with the American people in July and released previously classified information, including: 

“Americans were blatantly lied to about the security of our election infrastructure, including electronic voting machines and ballot-counting systems. We are releasing a series of previously classified U.S. Intelligence Community Assessments and other reports proving that our government has long known these machines are extremely vulnerable to attack. As one assessment states: “We judge that U.S. adversaries, including at a minimum Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea, as well as non-state groups, have the capability to compromise U.S. election infrastructure.” The documents also state: “We assess that centralized election-related data repositories, such as voter registration databases, pollbooks, and official election websites, are most vulnerable to exploitation, and adversaries could use access to these systems to disrupt election processes.” Tonight, we are releasing all of these findings, spanning from January 2020 to June 2026. This is a cyber threat aimed at the very heart of our democracy.

Byrne and Santilli also walked through what Byrne presents as a staged social-control playbook — classification, visual separation, demonization, and preparation — applied to COVID-era and mask politics, which Byrne has detailed in his recent presentation The Greatest Hack in History (X).”

Looking ahead to November 2026, Byrne warned that a House flip would put Hakeem Jeffries in the speakership with an immediate push to impeach Trump and Vance, and that another Democrat-led administration could simply naturalize millions of illegal aliens and make election rigging unnecessary.

His bottom-line recommendation: Trump should use emergency authorities now to force a clean, transparent election — small precincts, ID and citizenship checks, ballots counted where cast, machines out — before any result can be spun as “sore loserism.”

WATCH: Mike Waltz Embarrasses Kaitlan Collins When She Tries to ‘Educate’ Him on Supreme Court Case Law and Blabbers About Trump’s ‘Media Ban’

 

UN Ambassador Mike Waltz schools Kaitlan Collins outside the UN building on Monday. Credit: CNN screenshot

CNN’s most infamous ‘reporter’ got embarrassed during an interview with United Nations Ambassador Mike Waltz last night while acting like she knew more than him on the law and on Trump’s so-called media ban.

Collins spoke with Waltz outside the United Nations building on the night before Trump’s big address to the organization. Instead of talking to him about Trump’s upcoming speech and his ideas for UN reform, she spent her time with Waltz hectoring him over Trump’s ban on CNN’s access to the White House.

Waltz was in no mood to deal with Collins’s nonsense, especially when she refused to listen to what he was saying in response. He then schooled her on the previous Supreme Court cases that give the President the right to ban outlets from White House. 

When Collins tried to object by saying that he was wrong on Supreme Court case law and that Trump had essentially banned CNN from reporting, Waltz quipped, “He’s not saying, ‘Don’t go out and report. Heck, we’re talking right now!

He reiterated this when Collins stubbornly refused to listen and repeated herself. Finally, he schooled her when she brought up Trump’s argument that the media WH ban was justified on national security grounds.

WATCH:

WALTZ: You just ignored what I said. You don’t have an inherent right to any government facility you want, whether it’s Langley or the White House. And that has been determined by multiple cases in the 60,70, and as recently as a few years ago…

COLLINS: But actually that case…

WALTZ: That’s an important distinction.

COLLINS: I remember you said that to Dana Bash on Sunday. That case found that…Reporters don’t have carte blanche to do everything, but you can’t just ban outlets based on their viewpoint or reporting.

WALTZ: He’s not saying, “Don’t go out and report.” Heck, we’re talking right now!

I hope we can talk about the reforms we’re going to do in the United Nations…But if we want to spend the entire time talking about this, fine.

COLLINS: But didn’t the president ban free outlets from…

WALTZ: I’m standing here talking to CNN right now, and you just referenced when I was on CNN on Sunday morning. That is very different than when you have access to every government institution.

COLLINS: The president is now making an argument that it’s a national security threat (for CNN to have access to White House). He did not make that argument Friday, Saturday, or Sunday…

WALTZ: I think when we have outlets relying on anonymous sources, talking about the levels of munition in the middle of conflict, vulnerabilities, deployment orders…that are highly classified, that’s absolutely a national security threat and should be investigated and prosecuted.

Monday, 21 September 2026

REPORT: Trump Prepares Crippling ICC Sanctions That Could Cut Court Off From Global Financial System

 

International Criminal Court at The Hague

President Donald Trump is reportedly preparing to dramatically escalate his administration’s campaign against the International Criminal Court, with fresh sanctions that could severely hamper the Hague tribunal’s ability to function.

Under plans reported by The Wall Street Journal, the administration would prohibit most financial transactions involving the ICC after a six-to-seven-month grace period.

Reuters independently reported the existence of the proposal but said it had not verified the Journal’s details. 

The consequences could be enormous.

Cutting the ICC off from transactions involving American companies and the U.S.-dominated financial system could make it almost impossible for the court to conduct routine international business. 

The Journal described the planned measures as potentially far more damaging than the sanctions Washington has already imposed on individual ICC officials. 

Trump has been targeting the ICC since returning to office after the court issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant over alleged war crimes in Gaza.

He previously signed an executive order in February 2025 declaring that the court had engaged in “illegitimate and baseless actions” against the U.S. and Israel and authorizing asset freezes and other penalties against officials involved. 

Secretary of State Marco Rubio has described the ICC as an “unaccountable arbiter of a new global law” that threatens U.S. sovereignty.

Meanwhile, Washington has sanctioned a series of senior judges, prosecutors, and other officials connected to cases involving Israel or the United States. 

Under the latest proposal, most transactions with the court would eventually become prohibited, with only limited exceptions such as communications-related activity.

Such restrictions could leave banks, contractors, and other international companies unwilling or unable to deal with the ICC. 

A final decision has not yet been announced. But if Trump proceeds with the plan as reported, the ICC could soon face the greatest existential threat since it was founded in 2002.