This exchange between Mary Katharine Ham and a CNN panel on the differences between spying and surveillance is a few days old, but as Mollie Hemingway says below, we’re still “chuckling” over it.
In summary, there is no difference between the two words “because they’re synonyms”:
I keep chuckling over this exchange:
FINNEY: But why spying instead of surveillance if you know the difference.
TAPPER: Yes.
MARY KATHARINE HAM, CNN POLITICAL COMMENTATOR: Because they're synonyms. That's why.http://www.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1904/11/cg.02.html …
2,084 people are talking about this
HAM: Surveilling Americans is indeed a very large and scary deal... And it remains one now just as it was then.
FINNEY: ...again, in using the word spying, he was trying to throw a negative connotation on --
HAM: There's a negative connotation on spying on American citizens.
1,612 people are talking about this
Bonus exchange:
Listening to @mkhammer having to explain to the @CNNSotu table what the word "spying" means was comically tragic. Looking @jaketapper in the eye and saying, "If you're surveilling someone, you're spying on them." Jake graciously conceded the point. LOL
See PoliticalPopcornNews's other Tweets
This, naturally, triggered Resistance warrior Seth Abramson, who asked MKH to apologize:
4/ What @mkhammer could do, as could anyone who makes a mistake on TV, is go on social media and say, I made a mistake and said the Attorney General was talking about authorized surveillance when he was talking about unauthorized surveillance. And that apology should be accepted.
133 people are talking about this
Er. . ., yeah. That’s not going to happen:
He clarified & said that’s what he was referring to; there is an open question & IG investigation into whether there was improper use of FISA here; & I’ve always been VERY wary of gov’t surveillance of American citizens bc there’s plenty precedent for abuse, even when authorized.
See Mary Katharine Ham's other Tweets
I fail to see how that makes me a dissembler. You think “spying” has negative connotations? Good, govt surveilling American citizens w/o their knowledge, esp through FISA Ct, should have negative connotations. It could just be that I...disagree with you.
See Mary Katharine Ham's other Tweets
And, if that puts me on the opposite site of the issue from someone like Clapper, who lied under oath to Congress about *spying* on American citizens by dragnetting our data, I’m okay with that.
See Mary Katharine Ham's other Tweets
No comments:
Post a Comment